Pet Therapy in the Emergency Department and Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pet Therapy in the Emergency Department and Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors
Gaudet, L. A. Elliott, S. A. Ali, S. Kammerer, E. Stauffer, B. Felkar, B. Scott, S. D. Dennett, L. Hartling, L.
Year
2021
Journal
Academic Emergency Medicine
Volume
24
Pages
24
BACKGROUND: Pet therapy, or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), have demonstrated positive effects for patients, families and health care providers (HCP) in inpatient settings. However, the evidence supporting AAI in emergency or ambulatory care settings is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of AAI on patient, family, and HCP experience in these settings. METHODS: We searched (from inception to May 2020) Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, plus grey literature, for studies assessing AAI in emergency and ambulatory care settings on: 1) patient and family anxiety/distress or pain; and 2) HCP stress. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were done in duplicate with conflicts adjudicated by a third party. Random-effects meta-analyses are reported as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as appropriate. RESULTS: We included 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 341 patients, 146 HCP, 122 child caregivers), 4 before-after (before-after; 83 patients), and 1 mixed-method study (124 patients). There was no effect across three RCTs measuring patient-reported anxiety/distress (n=380; SMD: -0.36, 95% CI: -0.95 to 0.23; I<sup>2</sup> =81%), while two before-after studies suggested a benefit (n=80; SMD: -1.95, 95% CI: -2.99 to -0.91; I<sup>2</sup> =72%). Four RCTs found no difference in measures of observed anxiety/distress (n=166; SMD: -0.44; 95% CI: -1.01 to 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> =73%) while one before-after study reported a significant benefit (n=60; SMD: -1.64, 95% CI: -2.23 to -1.05). Three RCTs found no difference in patient-reported pain (n=202; MD: -0.90; 95% CI: -2.01 to 0.22; I<sup>2</sup> =68%). Two RCTs reported positive but non-significant effects on HCP stress. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on the effectiveness of AAI in emergency and ambulatory care settings. Rigorous studies using global experience-oriented (or patient-identified) outcome measures are required.

Oversett med Google Translate
-
Type of intervention

Treatment and Child Welfare Interventions

Topic

Mental Health Problems and Disorders

Anxiety Problems

Anxiety and Anxiousness

Stress

Biological Risk Factors, Diseases and Symptoms

Somatic Disease

Intervention

Psychosocial Treatments

Relaxation Interventions

The organization of interventions

Emergency Care

Age group

Preschool Aged Children (3-5 years)

School Aged Children (6-12 years)

More information
Looking for more information on this topic? Click on the links below to search PsykTestBarn and Håndboka