Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors
Crockett, M. A. Nunez, D. Martinez, P. Borghero, F. Campos, S. Langer, A. I. Carrasco, J. Martinez, V.
Year
2025
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Volume
8
Pages
e2454730
Importance: Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people. Data Sources: Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included "stigma," "mental health," "mental disorders," "adolescents," "youth," and "randomized controlled trial." Study Selection: Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., A.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment. Results: A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.

Oversett med Google Translate
-
Type of intervention

Preventive- and Promotive Health Interventions

Topic

Mental Health Problems and Disorders

Development and Life Coping Skills

Stress Management and Self-regulation

Intervention

Psychological Treatments

Psychoeducational Interventions

The organization of interventions

Group Interventions

School/Preschoolbased Interventions

Age group

Adolescents (13-18 years)

More information
Looking for more information on this topic? Click on the links below to search PsykTestBarn and Håndboka