A meta-analysis encompassing all studies evaluating the impact of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on parent and child outcome measures was conducted in an effort to identify variables that moderate the program's effectiveness.
Hierarchical linear models (HLM) with three levels of data were employed to analyze effect sizes.
The results (N=55 studies) indicate that Triple P causes positive changes in parenting skills, child problem behavior and parental well-being in the small to moderate range, varying as a function of the intensity of the intervention.
The most salient findings of variables moderating the interventions' impact were larger effects found on parent report as compared to observational measures and more improvement associated with more intensive formats and initially more distressed families.
Sample characteristics (e.g., child's age, being a boy) and methodological features (e.g., study quality) exhibited different degrees of predictive power.
The analysis clearly identified several strengths of the Triple P system, most importantly its ability to effect meaningful improvement in parents and children.
Some limitations pertain to the small evidence-base of certain formats of Triple P and the lack of follow-up data beyond 3 years after the intervention.
Many of the present findings may be relevant to other evidence-based parenting programs.
Oversett med Google Translate